Proportionality of the Application of Criminal Liability for Gifts in the Healthcare System of Lithuania
Alternatives for Effective Corruption Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5507/Keywords:
corruption, healthcare, criminal liability, proportionality, utilitarianism, retributivismAbstract
Proportionality is a fundamental principle of criminal law. The issue whether the application of criminal liability to patients and doctors for participating in illegal gift “transactions” with the use of descriptive, analytical, logical, and comparative methods was examined. Focusing on utilitarianism and retributivism, the content of proportionality was presented: the balance between benefit to society and harm to the offender, the effectiveness of punishment, the implementation of justice as retribution, and the dangerousness of the offence and the offender. The conclusion was made that the criminal liability for gratitude gifts in the healthcare system is not proportionate. Consequently, recommendations were made for the establishment of disciplinary or administrative liability for symbolic gifts of gratitude in the healthcare sector of Lithuania.
References
ANDERECK, William. Yes: If they are Given Out of Beneficence Or Appreciation. The Western Journal of Medicine, 2001, vol. 175, no. 2, p. 76.
BENTHAM, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000.
BERENTA, Juozas. Tarp kyšio policininkui ir vokelio gydytojui nėra jokio skirtumo (There is no Difference between a Bribe to a Policeman and an Envelope to a Doctor). [online]. Available at: <https://www.delfi.lt/verslas/verslas/j-berenta-tarp-kysio-policininkui-ir-vokelio-gydytojui-nera-jokio-skirtumo-61604783> Accessed: 15.04.2024.
BINDER, Guyora, SMITH, Nicholas, J. Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent. Rutgers LJ, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 115–224.
BIKELIS, Skirmantas. Rethinking system of sanctions for trafficing of goods: the problem of proportionality (I). Principe of proportionality and criminal sanctions. Teisės problemos, 2012, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 5–24.
CARO, Mario De. Utilitarianism and Retributivism in Cesare Beccaria. Italian Law Journal, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
CLARKSON, C., M., V. Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak. Crim Law and Philos, 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–135.
CORLETT, J., Angelo. Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy, 2001, vol. 76, no. 295, pp. 77–110.
Code of Administrative Offences of the Republic of Lithuania. TAR, 2015, no. 11216.
Code of Conduct for Employees of Healthcare Institutions, TAR, 2021, no. 16035.
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers. Recommendation No. R (91) 1, 1991; ECHR (1950, ETS 5).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 89–2741.
DACHAK, Hadi. The Principle of Proportionality of Crime and Punishment in International Documents. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2021, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 684–694.
Draft Law on Supplementing Article 250(2) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania, 2001, no. IXP-342(2SP).
ELTA. Tyrimas: neoficialios dovanos medikams populiaresnės tarp vyresnių gyventojų (Research: Informal Gifts for Doctors are more Popular among the Elderly Population). [online]. Available at: <https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/sveikata/682/2212965/tyrimas-neoficialios-dovanos-medikams-populiaresnes-tarp-vyresniu-gyventoju> Accessed: 03.03.2024.
EMIGHOLZ, Carl. Utilitarianism, Retributivism and the White Collar-Drug Crime Sentencing Disparity: Toward a Unified Theory of Enforcement. Rutgers Law Review, 2006, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 583–614.
ENGLE, Eric. The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview. Dartmouth Law Journal, 2012, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 534. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2023.
FISH, Morris, J. An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57–71.
FRASE, Richard. Punishment Purposes. STAN. L. REV, 2005, vol. 58, no. 67, pp. 67–84.
GRAY, David. Punishment as Suffering. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1619–1693.
HAIST, Matthew. Deterrence in a Sea of Just Deserts: Are Utilitarian Goals Achievable in a World of Limiting Retributivism. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 2009, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 789–822.
HIRSCH, Andrew von. Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment. Crime and Justice, 1992, vol. 16, pp. 55–98.
KARGAUDIENĖ, Aušra. Principle of proportionality in administrative law and its application in Lithuanian courts. Jurisprudencija, 2005, vol. 78, no. 70, pp. 29–38.
LATINYTĖ, Rūta. Gift-giving as an expression of interpersonal relations in everyday practices in Lithuania at the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century. Doctoral thesis, Vilnius University, Vilnius, 2022.
Law on the Civil Service of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1999, no. 66–2130.
LETSAS, George. Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality. Current Legal Problems, 2018, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 53–86.
Lithuania v. A.Ž. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 23 February 2022. Application no. 2K-35-719/2022.
Lithuania v. I.P., I.A., Ž.L. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 3 November 2020. Application no. 2K-221-942/2020.
Lithuania v. K.D. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 3 February 2022. Application no. 2K-23-628/2022.
Lithuania v. R.K. et al. Court of Appeal of Lithuania. Judgment of 22 November 2023. Application no. 1A-40-307/2023.
Lithuania v. R.P. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 10 November 2015. Application no. 2K-P-100-222/2015.
Lithuania v. R.T. et al. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 27 December 2007. Application no. 2K-594/2007.
Lithuania v. V.R. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 29 December 2016. Application no. 2K-449-942/2016.
Lithuania v. V.Š. Court of Appeal of Lithuania. Judgment of 28 February 2024. Application no. 1A-166-870/2024.
MACKAY, Kathryn. Rules and Resistance: A Commentary on “An Archeology of Corruption in Medicine”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2022, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 123–127.
MALINAUSKAS, Vygantas. Theoretical and methodological aspects of ensuring a balance between human rights and public interest. Doctoral thesis, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, 2018.
MONRO, Charles, Henry (trans). The Digest of Justinian. Cambridge University Press, 1904.
POSNER, Richard, A. An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review, 1985, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1193–1231.
R. v. M. (CA). [1996] 1 SCR 500 (Canadian case).
ROBINSON, Paul, H. Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should be Punished How Much. University of Pennsylvania, 2008.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 2 October 2001. Official Gazette, 2001, no. 85–2977.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 6 December 2000. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 105–3318.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 10 November 2005. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 134–4819.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 December 2004. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 181–6708.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 29 December 2004. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 1–7.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 29 September 2005. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 117–4239.
SAKALAUSKAS, Gintautas, BIKELIS, Skirmantas, KALPOKAS, Vaidas, POCIENĖ, Aušra. Criminal Policy in Lithuania: Trends and Comparative Aspects. Vilnius: Law Institute of Lithuania, 2012.
SINKEVIČIUS, Vytautas. Principles and limits of interpretation of the Constitution. Jurisprudencija, 2005, vol. 67, no. 59, pp. 7–19.
SLOT, Brigitte, SWART, Linette de, WEISTRA, Kim, OORTWIJN, Wija, WANROOIJ, Niels van, RAETS, Tess. Updated Study on Corruption in the Healthcare Sector. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2017.
SPECTOR, Horacio. Constitutional proportionality and moral deontology. Jurisprudence, 2021, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–25.
SUMMERS, Robert, S. H.L.A. Hart on Justice. The Journal of Philosophy, 1962, vol. 59, no. 18, pp. 497–500.
ŠEDBARAS, Stasys. Administracinė atsakomybė (Administrative Liability). Vilnius: Justitia, 2005.
TOPCHII, Vasyl, ZADEREIKO, Svitlana, DIDKIVSKA, Galyna, BODUNOVA, Olesia, SHEVCHENKO, Dmytro. International Anti-Corruption Standards. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2021, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 277–286.
VALANČIUS, Virgilijus, NORKUS, Rimvydas. Aspects of Contact of Administrative and Criminal Justice in Lithuania. Jurisprudencija, 2006, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 91–98.
ZHU, Jiangnan. Do Severe Penalties Deter Corruption? A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Chinese Case. China Review, 2012, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
