The Sustainability Concept in the Consumer Purchase Contract
Is the R2R Directive Sustainable Enough?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5507/Keywords:
right to repair (R2R), EU Directive 2024/1799, sustainability, circular economy, planned obsolescence, intellectual property rights, independent repairers, compatible spare parts, consumer lawAbstract
The article deals with the legal analysis of Directive (EU) 2024/1799 (so called Right to Repair Directive), which represents a key step in the regulation of the right to repair of goods in the European Union. The Directive aims to promote sustainable consumer behaviour, extend the lifetime of products and contribute to the objectives of the circular economy. The article focuses on the key provisions of the Directive, analyses its benefits and weaknesses, and identifies the legal challenges associated with implementation, including the impact of intellectual property rights, economic and cultural barriers to repair, and the lack of a clear preference for repair over replacement of goods. The paper concludes by assessing that the Directive represents a significant step in the right direction, but that its effectiveness depends on further adjustments to strengthen its impact and meet the European Union’s ambitious sustainability objectives.
References
ANDRAŠKO, Jozef, HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej, MESARČÍK, Matúš, KERIKMÄE, Tanel, KAJANDER, Aleksi. Sustainable Data Governance for Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility in the European Union. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 19, 10610.
ANDRAŠKO, Jozef, MESARČÍK, Matúš, HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework. AI & Society. 2021, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 623–636.
ATAÍDE, Rui, BARROSO RODRIGUES, António. Consumer Protection in the European Union Regarding Planned Obsolescence and the Right to Repair. Centro de Investigação de Direito Privado (CIDP), 2023, Research Paper No. 01/2023, Originally publsihed in „Consumer Protection in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities (coord. Cayetana Santaolalla Montoya), European Commission, 2023.
AUGENHOFER, Susanne, ATAMER, Yeşim, POLUDNIAK GIERZ, Katarzyna. European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Common Rules Promoting the Repaire of Goods (COM(2023) 155 final) – Feedback of the European Law Institute. European Law Institute. 1 July 2023 – 2 July 2023. [online]. Available at: https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_ upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Feedback_Right_to_Repair.pdf. Accessed: 21.11.2024.
Commission staff working document impact assessment report. Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules promoting the repair of goods and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, Directives (EU) 2019/771 and (EU) 2020/1828, 2023, SWD(2023) 59 final, pp. 15.
CHAPMAN, Jonathan. Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Routledge, 2015.
GRINVALD, Leah, Chan, TUR-SINAI, Ofer. Intellectual Property Law and the Right to Repair. Fordham Law Review, 2019, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 63–128.
GRINVALD, Leah, Chan, TUR-SINAI, Ofer. The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States. Australian Intellectual Property Journal, 2020, vol. 98, pp. 98–110.
HERNANDEZ, Ricardo, MIRANDA, Constanza, GOÑI, Julian. Empowering sustainable consumption by giving back to consumers the ‘right to repair’. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 3. [online]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/850. Accessed: 15.10.2024.
HODGES, Ann, TAYLOR, Porcher. The Business fallout from the rapid obsolescence and planned obsolescence of high-tech products: downsizing of noncompetition agreements. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 2005, vol. VI, no. 3, pp. 1–32. [online]. Available at: https:// scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1230&context=l aw-faculty-publications. Accessed: 21.12.2024.
IIZUKA, Toshiaki. An empirical Analysis of Planned Obsolescence. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2007, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 191–226.
JOKANOVIĆ, Ivan. Lack of conformity of goods with the contract and sustainability issue – Directive (EU) 2019/771. Central European Academy Law Review, 2023, vol. 1, no.1, p. 83–102.
KRYLA-CUDNA, Katarzyna. Sales Contracts and the Circular Economy. European Review of Private Law, 2020, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1207–1230.
LECHNER, Gernot, WAGNER, Marcel Josef, TENA, Anna Diaz, FLECK, Christopher. REIMANN, Marc. Exploring a regional repair network with a public funding scheme for customer repairs: The ‘GRAZ repariert’-case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 288, no. 3.
LLORENTE-GONZALEZ, Leandro Javier, VENCE, Xavier. How labour-intensive is the circular economy? A policy-orientated structural analysis of the repair, reuse and recycling activities in the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, vol. 162. [online]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344920303505. Accessed: 1.10.2024.
LOOS, Marco. Repairing Consumer Sales Law. Amsterdam Law School, 2024, Research Paper No. 2024-38, Amsterdam Centre for Transformative Private Law Working Paper No. 2024-03. [online]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4983658 . Accessed: 21.12.2024.
LÓPEZ-BERMÚDEZ, Francisco, VENCE, Xavier. A critical assessment of the European Directive proposal on the common rules promoting the repair of goods. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, vol. 212. [online]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0921344924005871. Accessed: 21.11.2024.
MAGGIOLINO, Mariateresa. Planned Obsolescence: A Strategy in Search of Legal Rules. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, Vol. 50, pp. 405.
MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore, DALHAMMAR, Carl. Regulating Planned Obsolescence: A Review of Legal Approaches to Increase Product Durability and Reparability in Europe. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 2016, vol. 25. no. 3, pp. 387–394.
MAYCROFT, Neil. Consumption, Planned Obsolescence and Waste. University of Lincoln Working Paper, 2009. [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/429782/Consumption_Planned_ Obsolescence_and_Waste. Accessed: 21.12.2024.
MCCOLLOUGH, John. Consumer Discount Rates and the Decision to Repair or Replace a Durable Product: A Sustainable Consumption Issue. Journal of Economic Issues, 2010, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 183–204.
MOESLINGER Margot, ALMASY Kristof, JAMARD Marion, DE MAUPEOU Hugues. Towards an Effective Right to Repair for Electronics. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022.
PETROV KŘIVÁČKOVÁ, Jana, HAMUĹÁKOVÁ, Klára. Procedural specifics of resolving consumer disputes in individual civil court proceedings in the Czech Republic. International and Comparative Law Review, 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 8–31.
PIHLAJARINNE, T. European Steps to the Right to Repair: Towards a Comprehensive Approach to a Sustainable Lifespan of Products and Materials? University of Oslo Faculty of Law, 2020, Research Paper No. 2020-32.
PUENTES COCIÑA, Beltrán. The New Ecodesign Regulations: Towards More Circular Products? Revista Galega De Economía. 2024, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1–23.
SALERNO, Francesco. The challenges of the “right to repair” in the eu legal framework. In AMATUCCI, Carlo. (Ed.) New legal reality: challenges and perspectives. Collection of research papers in conjunction with the 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, 2021, pp. 104–114.
SIMON, Rita. Final consumption and sustainability – contribution of consumer law to SDG 12. In Climate Law and Litigation: Planetary, Regional, and Societal Perspectives. Selected Contributions from the ClimLaw: Graz 1st Annual PhD Workshop on Climate Law and Litigation. Research Center for Climate Law, Faculty of Law, University of Graz, 2023, pp. 123–151.
STOPPE, Pia. Vorschlag fur eine Anderung der Richtlinie 771/2019 – Anderung des Wahlrechts zwischen Nachlieferung und Nachbesserung aus der Sicht der Umweltvertraglichkeit. Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego, 2024, no. 2, pp. 93–118.
TERRYN, Evelyne. A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law. European Review of Private Law. 2019, vol. 853, no. 4, pp. 851–873.
TERZIOĞLU, Nazli. Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 289. [online]. Availabe at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620356900. Accessed: 15.10.2024.
TREBILCOCK, Michael. The limits of freedom of contract. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. University Press, 1993, pp. 310.
WIESER, Harald, TRÖGER, Nina. Exploring the inner loops of the circular economy: Replacement, repair, and reuse of mobile phones in Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, no. 172, pp. 3042–3055.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
