Abstract
Today, there is an increasing need to protect pupils and to ensure a safe environment, which is reflected in the approach to pupils in direct teaching practice. Safety in the area of sexuality is an important part of the appropriate approach of educators to pupils. In the Czech Republic, there are not many studies devoted to the topic of sexuality in the teacher-pupil relationship. In the subject of physical education (PE), other forms of pupil-teacher contact occur. On the basis of theories of interpersonal relationship, interactional touch and neuropsychological theories, touch can be considered as an important part of the teaching profession, which, especially in the field of TV, takes on a specific meaning. The aim of this research was to identify and describe what sexuality and touch mean to physical education teachers in their profession. The main research question was formulated as "How do physical education teachers perceive and interpret sexuality in teaching." This is a qualitative research conducted in the form of a multi-case study. Three physical education teachers working in primary and secondary schools were selected and in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with them. The coaches' statements were analyzed using data coding, clustering and pattern capture methods. The research findings suggest that physical education teachers significantly influence the development of students' sexuality and gender identity because they are in close physical and communicative contact with their students. Sensitive verbal communication without derogatory remarks and taunts plays a key role in fostering mutual trust between teacher and pupil. For the safety of pupils and teachers themselves, it is important to include sex education topics in the undergraduate training of future physical education teachers.
References
- ALLEN, Louisa. The camera never lies?: analysing photographs in research on sexualities and schooling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2011, 32.5: 761-777. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- ALLEN, Louisa. ‘The 5 cm rule’: biopower, sexuality and schooling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2009, 30.4: 443-456. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- BERG, Päivi; KOKKONEN, Marja. Heteronormativity meets queering in physical education: The views of PE teachers and LGBTIQ+ students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2022, 27.4: 368-381. Search in Google Scholar
- BOYCE, Carolyn; NEALE, Palena. Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder international, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
- CALDEBORG, Annica; MAIVORSDOTTER, Ninitha; ÖHMAN, Marie. Touching the didactic contract—A student perspective on intergenerational touch in PE. Sport, Education and Society, 2019, 24.3: 256-268. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- CARTER, Nancy. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Number 5/September 2014, 2014, 41.5: 545-547. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- DICICCO‐BLOOM, Barbara; CRABTREE, Benjamin F. The qualitative research interview. Medical education, 2006, 40.4: 314-321. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- KIRK, David; O’SULLIVAN, Mary; MACDONALD, Doune. Handbook of physical education, London: Sage, 2006, 723–739. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- FASTING, Kari; CHRONI, Stiliani; KNORRE, Nada. The experiences of sexual harassment in sport and education among European female sports science students. Sport, Education and Society, 2014, 19.2: 115-130. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- FERFOLJA, Tania; ULLMAN, Jacqueline. Gender and sexuality diversity in a culture of limitation: Student and teacher experiences in schools. Taylor & Francis, 2020. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- HEMPHILL, Dennis; SYMONS, Caroline. Sexuality matters in physical education and sport studies. Quest, 2009, 61.4: 397-417. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- CHEN, YuChun; CURTNER-SMITH, Matthew D. Hegemonic masculinity in sport education: Case studies of pre-service physical education teachers with teaching orientations. Sport, Education and society, 2015, 20.4: 546-563. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- CHEN, YuChun; CURTNER-SMITH, Matthew. Hegemonic masculinity in sport education: Case studies of experienced in-service teachers with teaching orientations. European Physical Education Review, 2013, 19.3: 360-380. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- LANDI, Dillon. Toward a queer inclusive physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2018, 23.1: 1-15. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- PIEDRA, Joaquín, et al. Homophobia and heterosexism: Spanish physical education teachers’ perceptions. Sport in Society, 2016, 19.8-9: 1156-1170. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- PIPER, Heather; GARRATT, Dean; TAYLOR, Bill. Child abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’in PE teaching and sports coaching. In: Moral Panic in Physical Education and Coaching. Routledge, 2017. p. 9-24. Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
- CORBIN, Juliet; STRAUSS, Anselm. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications, 2014. Search in Google Scholar
- SYKES, Heather Jane. Queer bodies: Sexualities, genders, & fatness in physical education. Peter Lang, 2011. Search in Google Scholar
- TU, Yangjun; WANG, Juanjuan; YAO, Limin. Teachers’ concerns regarding touching their students in the classroom: A scale development study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2019, 37.5: 578-589. Search in Google Scholar
- VAN DER STEEG, Esther, et al. A Dutch perspective on sexual integrity in sport contexts: definition and meaning for practice. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2021, 26.5: 460-482. Search in Google Scholar
- VAREA, Valeria; ÖHMAN, Marie. ‘Break the rules or quit the job’: physical education teachers’ experiences of physical contact in their teaching practice. Sport, Education and Society, 2023, 28.4: 395-406. Search in Google Scholar
